<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Adsense Rollercoaster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stopgeek.com/the-adsense-rollercoaster.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stopgeek.com/the-adsense-rollercoaster.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.stopgeek.com/the-adsense-rollercoaster.html#comment-18289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 01:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopgeek.com/the-adsense-rollercoaster.html#comment-18289</guid>
		<description>Different ads are displayed, and you are payed a % of what the advertiser pays google to be listed. in more competitive markets (for example insurance), obviously competitors have to pay a lot more to be listed in the ad units (and the ads shown are suited to the content within the page). so you get a higher amount per click from that advert. likewise less competitive markets won't require as much for companies to pay to get their ad there so you get a lower %.i'm pretty sure it explains this in their faqs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different ads are displayed, and you are payed a % of what the advertiser pays google to be listed. in more competitive markets (for example insurance), obviously competitors have to pay a lot more to be listed in the ad units (and the ads shown are suited to the content within the page). so you get a higher amount per click from that advert. likewise less competitive markets won&#8217;t require as much for companies to pay to get their ad there so you get a lower %.i&#8217;m pretty sure it explains this in their faqs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
