Pay Per Post Scheme

4 Responses

1. annelions

   October 30th, 2006 at 11:31 am

   1

   Do you have any facts to support that it’s ‘more biased’ than ‘normal’ blogging, or are you just basing this off the Techcrunch article?

2. Vic

   October 30th, 2006 at 1:09 pm

   2

   Hi annelions, thanks for the response. While my observations were based on the Tech Crunch article, i have tried signing up to sites that used a Pay Per Post method.

   The one I did sign up for, though I wont mention any names, did specifically instruct me to include more “pros” than “cons”

   To me, this means that the review is biased. Im pretty sure not all of these sites are like this, but in my experience (although brief) they have been.

3. annelions

   October 30th, 2006 at 2:29 pm

   3

   Not all websites/companies are created equal. PayPerPost has many, many ‘neutral’ offers (which are allowed to be negative, if that’s how you feel). Also, you’re allowed to pick and choose if you want to review something or not, if you don’t want to give a positive review, you don’t have to take the offer.

   If you’re genuinely curious, I strongly suggest you visit http://boards.payperpost.com/ where the community of posties & PPP staff are happy to answer any questions.

4. Vic

   October 30th, 2006 at 2:43 pm

   4

   Thank you for the link. I will definitely check that link out.