<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Should Use The rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; Attribute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stopgeek.com/digg-should-use-the-regnofollow-attribute.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stopgeek.com/digg-should-use-the-regnofollow-attribute.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Slinky</title>
		<link>http://www.stopgeek.com/digg-should-use-the-regnofollow-attribute.html#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>Slinky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 07:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopgeek.com/digg-should-use-the-regnofollow-attribute.html#comment-967</guid>
		<description>As andy said, those pages disappear after about 10-30 days, and the pagerank will drop shortly (pagerank constantly updates so your pagerank will fall). Those sites really only get a huge pagerank if they appear on the front page (and most of them have no chance of that).

Also SEO is not that black &#38; white, those sites need a lot more then just a link on digg. If digg adds the nofollow relationship to links, it would make lose its own pagerank - because you need a certain amount of links that link outwards - plus digg gains more keywords by doing this, because its own digg comments page shows up for certain keywords that these splogs use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As andy said, those pages disappear after about 10-30 days, and the pagerank will drop shortly (pagerank constantly updates so your pagerank will fall). Those sites really only get a huge pagerank if they appear on the front page (and most of them have no chance of that).</p>
<p>Also SEO is not that black &amp; white, those sites need a lot more then just a link on digg. If digg adds the nofollow relationship to links, it would make lose its own pagerank - because you need a certain amount of links that link outwards - plus digg gains more keywords by doing this, because its own digg comments page shows up for certain keywords that these splogs use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.stopgeek.com/digg-should-use-the-regnofollow-attribute.html#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopgeek.com/digg-should-use-the-regnofollow-attribute.html#comment-943</guid>
		<description>You are only looking at the front page pagerank

Most of those upcoming pages disappear into a crevasse so deep that the pagerank they pass on is minimal.

There are some benefits for indexing a new site, but most sites updated frequently don't have a problem with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are only looking at the front page pagerank</p>
<p>Most of those upcoming pages disappear into a crevasse so deep that the pagerank they pass on is minimal.</p>
<p>There are some benefits for indexing a new site, but most sites updated frequently don&#8217;t have a problem with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
