07 Dec
Posted by Vic as Computers, Internet, Programming
What’s the number one thing that digg is missing?
I was browsing digg today, and proceeded to check out the ‘Upcoming’ section of the site. I saw absolutely nothing of interest to me. And im pretty sure it wouldn’t of been of interest to anyone else. I even encountered sites made for adsense that only carry ad links. But I didn’t think much of it because I assumed digg used the rel=”nofollow” attribute on its links. I was saddened to discover it does not.

So, what can be done?
Digg really needs to use the rel=”nofollow” attribute. This will stop shitty sites from increasing in page rank. Now, what about sites that are good, and are worth linking to? Well, my idea is to use this attribute on links that are in the ‘Upcoming’ section only. Once they make to the front page, the attribute would be removed.
2 Responses
Andy Beard
December 7th, 2006 at 3:56 pm
1You are only looking at the front page pagerank
Most of those upcoming pages disappear into a crevasse so deep that the pagerank they pass on is minimal.
There are some benefits for indexing a new site, but most sites updated frequently don’t have a problem with this.
Slinky
December 8th, 2006 at 1:42 am
2As andy said, those pages disappear after about 10-30 days, and the pagerank will drop shortly (pagerank constantly updates so your pagerank will fall). Those sites really only get a huge pagerank if they appear on the front page (and most of them have no chance of that).
Also SEO is not that black & white, those sites need a lot more then just a link on digg. If digg adds the nofollow relationship to links, it would make lose its own pagerank - because you need a certain amount of links that link outwards - plus digg gains more keywords by doing this, because its own digg comments page shows up for certain keywords that these splogs use.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Categories
Archives
StopGeek Friends